Powell & Moya was an architectural partnership formed in London, England in 1946… subscribers only
Powell, Kenneth. Powell & Moya. (London: RIBA Publishing, 2009)
Bibliography
1. Clifford, H. Dalton. ‘A house that surveys the Weald’. Country Life vol. vol. 124, 7 August 1958 pp. 286-287 [A description of Martins, a weekend house in Toy’s Hill, Kent designed by Powell & Moya in 1954] 2. Hanson, Brian. ‘Powell and Moya’ in Macmillan Encyclopedia of Architects. Volume 3. Edited by Adolf K. Plakzek. New York and London: Macmillan and Free Press, 1982 p. 469 3. Harwood, Elain. Mid-Century Britain. Modern Architecture 1938-1963. London: Batsford, 2021 4. Hitchcock, Henry-Russell. ‘Pimlico’. Architectural Review [London] vol. 114, no. 681, 1953 pp. 176-184 [Housing at Churchill Gardens, Pimlico, London designed by Powell & Moya] 5. Levey, Michael. ‘3 new art galleries’. Architectural Design vol. 38, October 1968n pp. 483-489 [Discusses a new art gallery designed by Powell & Moya for Christ Church College, Oxford] 6. Mills, Edward David. The New Architecture in Britain 1946-1953. London: The Standard Catalogue Co., 1953 [Discusses two houses in Chichester, Sussex designed by Powell & Moya pp. 55-62] 7. Powell Moya and Partners. London : Powell Moya, 1989. 8. Powell, Kenneth. Powell & Moya. London: RIBA Publishing, 2009 9. Powell, Kenneth. ‘Powell & Moya: the first fifty years’. Architects’ Journal 4 July 1966 pp. 27-58 10. Powell, Philip. ‘'No visible means of support': Skylon and the South Bank’ The Journal of the Twentieth Century Society [Festival of Britain Special Issue] no.5, 2001 pp. 82-86 11. Powell, Philip. ‘Architects’ approach to architecture’. Royal Institute of British Arc hitects vol. 73, March 1966 pp. 116-127 [Philip Powell discusses Churchill Gardens in Pimlico, London designed by his practice Powell & Moya] 12. Webb, Michael. Architecture in Britain Today. London: Country Life, 1969 13. ‘Chichester Festival Theatre’. Architects’ Journal vol. 136, no. 1§, 1962 pp. 25-40 14. ‘Cripps Building, St John’s College, Cambridge’. Architectural Review [London] vol. 142, no. 847, 1967 pp. 181-188